1. Submission Details
- Submission Title:
- Contributor Name:
- Submission Date:
- Sector Category:
(Education / Healthcare / Technology / Administration / Social Impact) - Type of Contribution:
(Article, GPT Prompt, Report, Visual Asset, Other)
2. Quality Compliance Checklist
Review Criteria | Yes | No | N/A | Comments/Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Content aligns with SayPro’s thematic focus | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
Original and plagiarism-free | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
Proper citations and references provided | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
Clear, professional, and consistent tone | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
Free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
Content is logically structured and coherent | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
Visuals (if any) meet quality and rights standards | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
Compliance with SayPro’s ethical guidelines | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
Contributor permissions and usage rights confirmed | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
Submission meets all format and technical specifications | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
3. Final Reviewer Assessment
- Overall Quality Rating (1-5):
- Is the submission approved for publication/use?
- Approved
- Approved with minor revisions
- Requires major revisions
- Rejected
- Summary of Reviewer Feedback:
(Include key points, recommended edits, or reasons for rejection)
4. Reviewer Information
- Reviewer Name:
- Reviewer Role:
- Date of Review:
- Reviewer Signature:
5. Follow-Up Actions (if any)
- Required Revisions:
- Revision Deadline:
- Resubmission Date:
- Additional Comments:
Instructions for Use
- Complete this form after thorough review of the submission.
- Provide clear, actionable feedback to contributors where needed.
- Keep a copy of this form in the project file for records and accountability.
Leave a Reply