SayPro Police Performance Evaluation Form

Program Reference: SCSPR-81 – Police Accreditation Strategic Partnerships
Document Code: SP-PPEF/2025
Evaluation Period: [Insert Start Date] – [Insert End Date]
Agency Name: [Insert Police Agency/Institution Name]
Evaluator Name: [Insert Evaluator’s Name]
Position/Rank: [Insert Evaluator’s Position]

---

1. Officer Information

Field	Details
Officer Name	[Insert Officer’s Full Name]
Badge Number	[Insert Badge Number]
Current Rank	[Insert Rank]
Department/Unit	[Insert Department or Unit]
Date of Last Evaluation	[Insert Date]

---

2. Evaluation Criteria

Please rate the officer on the following key performance areas using the scale:
5 – Excellent | 4 – Good | 3 – Satisfactory | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Poor | N/A – Not Applicable

A. Professional Competence

Performance Indicator	Rating	Comments
Knowledge of laws, regulations, and procedures	[ ]
Appropriate use of policing tools and equipment	[ ]
Report writing and documentation	[ ]
Compliance with SOPs and SayPro accreditation standards	[ ]

---

B. Operational Effectiveness

Performance Indicator	Rating	Comments
Response time and decision-making under pressure	[ ]
Ability to resolve incidents professionally	[ ]
Situational awareness and tactical execution	[ ]
Adherence to protocols during patrol, arrest, and investigation	[ ]

---

C. Conduct and Ethics

Performance Indicator	Rating	Comments
Integrity and ethical behavior	[ ]
Respect for human rights and dignity	[ ]
Non-discriminatory practices	[ ]
Confidentiality and professionalism	[ ]

---

D. Communication & Public Relations

Performance Indicator	Rating	Comments
Interaction with the public	[ ]
Communication with colleagues and supervisors	[ ]
Conflict resolution and de-escalation skills	[ ]
Community outreach or engagement efforts	[ ]

---

E. Training & Development

Performance Indicator	Rating	Comments
Participation in required SayPro training	[ ]
Demonstration of new skills or knowledge	[ ]
Initiative to pursue further professional development	[ ]
Use of SayPro’s digital learning tools/platform	[ ]

---

3. Summary Assessment

Overall Performance Rating:

• ☐ Excellent (Consistently exceeds expectations)
• ☐ Good (Frequently meets and occasionally exceeds expectations)
• ☐ Satisfactory (Meets expectations)
• ☐ Needs Improvement (Meets some expectations but requires monitoring)
• ☐ Unsatisfactory (Fails to meet expectations)

Key Strengths:

[Insert a short summary of the officer’s strengths]

Areas for Improvement:

[Insert a short summary of development areas or needed support]

---

4. Action Plan / Recommendations

Action or Support Required	Responsible Person	Target Date	Status
[Insert Action]	[Insert Name]	[MM/DD/YYYY]	☐ Pending ☐ In Progress ☐ Completed
[Insert Action]	[Insert Name]	[MM/DD/YYYY]	☐ Pending ☐ In Progress ☐ Completed

---

5. Signatures and Acknowledgements

Officer Acknowledgement	Evaluator Confirmation
I acknowledge that I have reviewed this evaluation and had the opportunity to discuss it.	I confirm this evaluation is accurate and complete.
Officer Name: [Insert Name]	Evaluator Name: [Insert Name]
Signature: ___________________	Signature: ___________________
Date: ________________________	Date: ________________________

---

📤 Submission Instructions

• Submit completed forms to evaluations@saypro.org or upload to the SayPro Accreditation Portal under “Performance Records”.
• All evaluations must be conducted and submitted by the last working day of each quarter/month depending on agency policy.