SayPro Impact Evaluation Tool, designed for use by the SayPro Strategic Partnerships Office and its partners to measure the effectiveness, relevance, and sustainability of projects and partnerships. This tool can be used post-implementation or at key review milestones to ensure that SayProβs work is making measurable progress toward its social, economic, and community goals.
π SayPro Impact Evaluation Tool
Department: SayPro Strategic Partnerships Office
ποΈ Evaluation Period: [Insert Start β End Date]
π Project / Partnership Title: [Insert Name]
π€ Evaluator Name / Team: [Insert Name(s)]
π Location: [Insert Country/Region]
β Section 1: Project Overview
Item | Details |
---|---|
Partner(s) Involved | [List all collaborating organizations] |
Type of Initiative | [Emergency Response / Programmatic / Training / Advocacy] |
Duration of Implementation | [Start Date β End Date] |
Total Budget (If applicable) | $[Insert Amount] |
Primary Objectives | [List 2β3 main goals] |
π Section 2: Key Impact Indicators
Indicator | Target Value | Actual Achieved | Variance | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of beneficiaries reached | [#] | [#] | [+/-] | |
% of objectives fully met | [e.g., 90%] | [e.g., 85%] | -5% | |
Community satisfaction (survey score avg) | [e.g., 80%] | [e.g., 87%] | +7% | Based on 100 community surveys |
Partners actively engaged | [#] | [#] | [+/-] | |
Articles/outputs published in SayPro Mag | [#] | [#] | [+/-] | |
Sustainability prospects (1β5 scale) | [4/5] | [3/5] | -1 | Further support needed for continuation |
π Section 3: Qualitative Evaluation
3.1. Effectiveness
- To what extent were the intended outcomes achieved?
[Describe the degree of success. Include examples or evidence.]
3.2. Efficiency
- Was the project implemented on time and within budget?
[Comment on resource use and process efficiency.]
3.3. Relevance
- How well did the initiative align with community needs and SayPro goals?
[Explain the alignment and demand.]
3.4. Sustainability
- Are the results likely to be sustained after SayProβs involvement ends?
[Include local ownership, training handovers, or exit strategies.]
3.5. Innovation / Value Add
- What new approaches, models, or innovations were introduced?
[Highlight uniqueness and adaptability.]
π¬ Section 4: Stakeholder Feedback (Summary)
Key Quotes or Insights from Beneficiaries / Partners:
- β_________________________________________________________β
- β_________________________________________________________β
- β_________________________________________________________β
β οΈ Section 5: Challenges & Mitigation
Challenge Identified | Impact Level | Mitigation Action Taken |
---|---|---|
Delay in logistics delivery | High | Used local suppliers for urgent needs |
Limited internet access in field areas | Medium | Provided offline training materials |
Partner response delay | Low | Improved communication protocols |
π Section 6: Lessons Learned & Recommendations
What worked well:
- [e.g., Strong local coordination]
- [e.g., Timely content creation for SayPro Magazine]
What needs improvement:
- [e.g., More frequent data collection checkpoints]
Recommendations for future partnerships:
- [e.g., Co-develop M&E tools with partners at kickoff]
π Section 7: Evaluation Summary Scorecard
Evaluation Criteria | Score (1β5) |
---|---|
Achievement of Objectives | [ ] |
Efficiency of Implementation | [ ] |
Stakeholder Satisfaction | [ ] |
Quality of Outputs | [ ] |
Innovation and Relevance | [ ] |
Sustainability Potential | [ ] |
Overall Rating: [Total out of 30] β [Excellent / Good / Fair / Poor]
βοΈ Section 8: Sign-Off
Evaluator Name: ____________________________________
Position / Team: ____________________________________
Date of Completion: _________________________________
Signature: _________________________________________
π€ Submit via SayPro Portal:
π www.saypro.online/impact-evaluation
π§ Contact: impact@saypro.online | βοΈ +27 800 SAYPRO (729776)
βMeasure what matters. Improve what transforms.β
β SayPro Strategic Partnerships Office
Leave a Reply